The European Banking Authority has revised its Guidelines on the equivalence of confidentiality and professional secrecy regimes in third countries, broadening the framework that governs how EU authorities share sensitive supervisory information beyond the bloc. According to the EBA press release, the update extends the 2022 Guidelines to reflect new requirements under the Markets in Crypto Assets Regulation (MiCAR) and to incorporate the Authority’s most recent equivalence assessments. [2][3]
The revised Guidelines explicitly confirm that the confidentiality and professional secrecy regimes of several third‑country authorities , including those in Australia, China, Montenegro, Peru, Serbia and the United Kingdom , meet the standards required for information exchange with EU competent authorities. The EBA said this recognition should ease cross‑border supervisory cooperation and underpin the use of cooperation arrangements where appropriate. [2][3][5]
In practical terms the update streamlines definitions, refreshes legal references and clarifies the application of the equivalence framework when competent authorities share information or engage in supervisory colleges and other joint arrangements. The EBA’s guidance now explicitly takes account of Article 100 of MiCAR, which requires that information exchanged under that Regulation remain confidential and protected by professional secrecy, with disclosure permitted only in strictly defined circumstances. The EBA noted these protections must bind anyone working for or with the competent authorities. [2][3][6]
The revision also widens the purpose of equivalence assessments beyond their earlier use to facilitate participation in EU supervisory colleges under the Capital Requirements Directive. According to the EBA, the Authority’s remit to monitor third‑country regulatory and supervisory frameworks creates a closer link between equivalence findings and the negotiation of cooperation arrangements, a linkage reinforced across a number of EU rulebooks including CRD, PSD2, BRRD and the Anti‑Money Laundering Directive. [4]
Member state competent authorities are required to report their compliance with the updated Guidelines within two months of translations being published in the official EU languages, the EBA said, signalling an expectation of prompt domestic implementation to preserve the timeliness and reliability of cross‑border exchanges. The Authority framed the changes as part of a broader effort to enhance supervisory convergence and facilitate international cooperation. [2][3][5]
The legal basis for the Guidelines remains Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, which mandates the EBA to support Member States in ensuring that third‑country confidentiality and professional secrecy frameworks meet EU standards. The EBA’s public documentation sets out the confidentiality principles and the methodology used in equivalence assessments, underscoring the technical and legal scrutiny applied when recognising third‑country regimes. [2][6]
Taken together, the updates signal a tightening and harmonisation of the rules that govern when and how EU supervisors may exchange confidential information with foreign counterparts, while expressly integrating the supervisory implications of newly adopted EU rules for crypto‑asset markets. Industry participants and national authorities will now be expected to align procedures and agreements with the clarified standards to preserve confidentiality and enable effective oversight across borders. [1][2][4]
📌 Reference Map:
##Reference Map:
- [1] (Mondovisione) - Paragraph 7
- [2] (EBA press release) - Paragraph 1, Paragraph 2, Paragraph 3, Paragraph 5, Paragraph 6, Paragraph 7
- [3] (EBA guidelines page) - Paragraph 1, Paragraph 2, Paragraph 3, Paragraph 5
- [4] (EBA press release on assessing equivalence) - Paragraph 4, Paragraph 7
- [5] (EBA guidelines landing page) - Paragraph 2, Paragraph 5
- [6] (EBA 2022 confidentiality principles) - Paragraph 3, Paragraph 6
Source: Noah Wire Services