The recent bibliometric study published via Wiley Online Library maps a maturing but still-evolving field that interrogates diversity management within Islamic banking, tracing 98 peer‑reviewed articles across 73 journals from 1990 to 2025 and highlighting accelerating scholarly interest since 2016 and a sharp surge after 2020. According to the paper, an annual growth rate of 8.24% and an average citation rate of 15.09 per document point to growing academic engagement, while an average document age of 5.28 years underscores the recency of most contributions. [1]

The dataset’s composition confirms a field rooted in specialised outlets: the International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research and ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance lead publication counts, signalling that debates on board diversity, Shariah governance and CSR are being developed primarily within Islamic‑finance and ethics journals rather than general management titles. The study notes, however, that interdisciplinary interest is emerging via outlets such as Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting and Global Finance Journal, suggesting diffusion beyond strictly religious or regional journals. [1]

Network and cluster analyses produced with VOSviewer reveal four thematic groupings. A governance cluster stresses structural differences between Islamic and conventional banks , notably the role of Shariah supervisory boards, interest‑free financing principles and differing disclosure practices , which shape performance, risk and ethical oversight. A gender‑diversity cluster foregrounds female representation, board heterogeneity and the educational profiles of both executive and Shariah scholars as determinants of transparency and legitimacy. A risk‑and‑reporting cluster links Shariah board expertise and disclosure quality to operational and reputational risk mitigation. A geographically inflected cluster highlights Malaysia as a distinctive institutional model where centralised Shariah governance, mandatory reporting (including zakat and CSR), and alignment with sustainability objectives have been comparatively well institutionalised. [1]

Country‑level production corroborates these thematic emphases: Indonesia and Malaysia lead output (each with 42 publications), followed by Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and the UK, with meaningful contributions also coming from the United States and Tunisia. The concentration in Southeast Asia reflects both regulatory sophistication and active research communities, while contributions from non‑Muslim‑majority countries underline Islamic finance’s globalised research pull. The authors interpret this distribution as evidence that diversity and inclusiveness in Islamic banking are increasingly framed as policy‑relevant, cross‑jurisdictional concerns. [1]

The Wiley paper’s findings align with other bibliometric reviews in related subfields. A Scopus‑based review of Islamic microfinance underscores poverty alleviation, financial inclusion and an emergent focus on Islamic social finance instruments such as waqf and zakat, together with fintech integration, signalling a broader trend toward ethical innovation and digitalisation across Islamic finance scholarship. According to that study, keyword and co‑authorship mapping similarly show shifting thematic priorities and expanding international collaboration. [2]

Separate bibliometric work covering a decade of Islamic finance research likewise observes rising volumes and increasing interdisciplinarity, noting Malaysia, the USA and the UK as prominent contributors and charting a peak in publication activity in 2021. That review emphasises the field’s cross‑disciplinary nature and its potential to address socio‑economic challenges, reinforcing the Wiley study’s interpretation that diversity and governance debates are part of a larger maturation process within Islamic finance research. [3]

More specialised bibliometric analyses of ESG and inclusive finance within Islamic banking confirm complementary trends: the literature on ESG practices in Islamic banks has grown steadily, with Muslim‑majority jurisdictions with robust regulatory frameworks leading the discourse and novel attention emerging from minority‑Muslim countries; and studies of financial inclusion highlight Islamic banking’s potential contribution to national inclusiveness through accessibility, availability and usage indicators. These reviews collectively suggest that diversity management in Islamic banks is being reframed within sustainability, inclusion and ESG agendas, expanding the policy stakes of governance research. [5][4]

Authorship and thematic mapping in the Wiley study identify a core group of prolific researchers , including Rusnah Binti Muhamad, Muhamad Abduh, Doddy Setiawan, Mustafa Raza Rabbani, Volker Nienhaus and Mushtaq Hussain Khan , whose work anchors the field’s intellectual structure across governance, gender inclusiveness and risk reporting. Industry and policy implications drawn from these authors’ contributions point to several convergent recommendations: strengthen Shariah board diversity (including professional and gender heterogeneity), improve disclosure of non‑Shariah income and zakat/CSR practices, and harmonise regulatory expectations to reduce jurisdictional disparities in governance quality. [1]

While the aggregate picture is one of consolidation and expansion, gaps remain. The Wiley study situates topics such as zakat, income diversification and some country‑specific debates (notably Pakistan) in an emerging/declining quadrant, signalling areas that require renewed empirical attention or conceptual recontextualisation. Other bibliometric reviews echo this call, identifying underexplored intersections, for example, how fintech and digital finance reshape inclusive Islamic microfinance, and how institutional factors shape ESG practice uptake, pointing researchers toward comparative, interdisciplinary and policy‑oriented work that connects governance diversity to measurable social and financial outcomes. [1][2][5][6][7]

In sum, the bibliometric evidence portrays diversity management in Islamic banking as a field that has moved from foundational doctrinal debates to applied governance, gender and ESG concerns, pursued largely within specialised journals but increasingly drawing interdisciplinary, cross‑country engagement. The emerging research agenda is pragmatic: testing whether board and Shariah governance diversity tangibly improve transparency, risk control and inclusive outcomes, and identifying regulatory arrangements that align Shariah compliance with broader sustainability and financial‑inclusion goals. [1][3][5]

📌 Reference Map:

  • [1] (Wiley Online Library) - Paragraph 1, Paragraph 2, Paragraph 3, Paragraph 4, Paragraph 8, Paragraph 9
  • [2] (WSISS/Westsciences) - Paragraph 5, Paragraph 8
  • [3] (Journal UiTM JEEIR) - Paragraph 6, Paragraph 8
  • [4] (JIEL/Smartinsight) - Paragraph 7, Paragraph 8
  • [5] (OUCI bibliometric study) - Paragraph 7, Paragraph 8, Paragraph 9
  • [6] (WSIS/Westsciences) - Paragraph 8
  • [7] (International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues / Econjournals) - Paragraph 8

Source: Noah Wire Services